Sex vs. Communication: What If You Have Different Goals for Couples Therapy?
You want to work on your sex life. Your partner wants to work on communication. When you are coming into couples therapy focused on different problems, it can be hard to know where you are supposed to begin. And if each of you already feels like your concern has been overlooked, even deciding what therapy should focus on can turn into another argument.
Different goals for couples therapy do not necessarily mean you want different things from the relationship. You may both want to feel closer, but have very different ideas about what needs to change first. When each person starts trying to prove that their concern matters more, choosing a goal for therapy can become another version of the conflict you are already having.
In this episode of The RISE to Intimacy Podcast, I explain how to tell whether you and your partner actually want different outcomes or simply disagree about where to begin. I also look at how communication, conflict, affection, and sexual intimacy can become part of the same cycle, and how to choose a shared starting point without treating one partner’s concern as more legitimate than the other.
Subscribe on Apple Podcasts or Spotify
2:19 - Why wanting better communication and wanting more sex may be more connected than they seem
5:16 - What “I want more sex” or “I want better communication” may actually mean to each partner
7:30 - How to tell if you want different things from the relationship or simply disagree about where to begin
9:50 - The relationship cycle that can make both communication and physical intimacy harder
11:59 - How to make room for one partner’s sexual boundaries and the other partner’s feelings of loss or rejection
13:10 - What disagreeing about therapy goals can reveal about the patterns already happening in your relationship
15:14 - When different therapy goals are actually a bigger disagreement about the future of the relationship
16:33 - Four questions to ask when different goals have kept you from starting couples therapy
Mentioned In Sex vs. Communication: What If You Have Different Goals for Couples Therapy?
Full Transcript
Valerie McDonnell: Welcome to The RISE To Intimacy Podcast. I'm your host, Valerie McDonnell and for over a decade, I've worked as a sex and couples therapist, because intimacy used to feel really overwhelming for me. I felt a lot of pressure to perform, I was disconnected from my body and I often felt like desire was out of reach for me. But through my own trauma work, I stopped checking out of my body and started feeling connected to it again. I learned what it's like to experience intimacy without fear, without shutting down and without numbing out. Now I'm on a mission to help you do the same thing. This podcast exists because trauma doesn't get the last word. You can learn how to calm your body, change the story you've been carrying and rebuild real connection, first with yourself and then with the people you love.
Let's begin. Recently, I was invited to speak to a group of therapists about my work as a sex and couples therapist. During the discussion, someone asked how I work with couples who come into therapy with different goals. It's a great question, because this often comes up during my initial consultations. One partner might say they want to improve communication, because they've been fighting a lot. And the other might say they want to work on their sex life, because they rarely find time to connect in that way. At first, these goals may sound completely different, which can leave couples wondering whether therapy will work, if they can't even agree on what they should prioritize, once they get there. But couples don't have to walk into therapy with identical goals. Instead, they need enough willingness to understand what each person's goals mean and how their concerns may be connected and where they can begin, without either partner feeling ignored. So that's what we're going to talk about today.
What happens when partners want to prioritize different goals for therapy, how to tell whether their goals are truly incompatible and how they can create a shared direction without pretending their individual concerns don't matter. Because wanting different things from therapy, doesn't necessarily mean you want different things from the relationship. Sometimes what you're really describing is the same pain from two different sides. So let's return to the couple I just described. One person says, I want more sex. The other says, I want better communication. It would be easy to turn this into a debate about which problems should be addressed first. The partner wanting more sex might say, we would feel closer if we were physically intimate again. The partner wanting better communication might respond, I don't want sex, when I don't feel close to you, because we're constantly arguing. Then each partner starts trying to prove that their concern is the most urgent one. Sex becomes framed as superficial, demanding, or less important than emotional connection. Communication becomes framed as an excuse, an endless prerequisite, or a way to avoid intimacy. And once that happens, goal setting becomes another version of the couple's conflict. Instead of asking, how are these concerns connected, they get stuck asking, which one of us is right? But that is usually not the most helpful question. Neither sexual intimacy nor communication is automatically the deeper or more legitimate concern. Both can be meaningful parts of a romantic relationship and they often influence each other.
Research has consistently found associations between sexual communication, sexual satisfaction, emotional intimacy and relationship satisfaction. But that doesn't mean better communication automatically creates sexual desire. And it certainly doesn't mean that communicating well obligates anyone to have sex. It means these areas of a relationship often interact. Frequent conflict can make it harder to feel emotionally or physically open. A prolonged absence of physical affection can leave someone feeling lonely, unwanted, or more sensitive to rejection. That hurt may then affect how they communicate, which can create more distance and make physical intimacy feel even less accessible. The couple may appear to have two separate problems, when they're actually caught in one reinforcing cycle. So instead of deciding which goal is more important, the first step is to understand which each goal represents. If you say that you want more sex, what are you hoping sex will help you experience? Is it pleasure, affection, playfulness, feeling chosen, feeling desired? Is it a sense of being romantic partners, instead of people who only manage a household together?
And if you want better communication, what are you hoping that will make possible? Do you want to feel heard, feel safer expressing yourself, to feel more capable of resolving problems? The point is not to assume that every stated goal conceals the same underlying need. Wanting more sex and wanting better communication are still distinct concerns. The point is to understand the lived experience underneath each one. I want more sex can sound like a request for a particular behavior, but the person may also be saying, I miss feeling close to you. I miss feeling wanted. I'm scared that this part of our relationship is gone. “I want us to communicate better” can sound like a request for a relationship skill. But that person may also be saying, I want to be able to tell you what I feel, without it turning into another painful experience.
Once partners can hear what the goals mean to each other, they may discover that their concerns are not as unrelated as they initially believed. One person wants to feel wanted. The other wants to feel emotionally safe enough to be open. Those are not identical needs, but they can both belong within a shared goal of creating a relationship where both partners can feel emotionally connected, honest, affectionate and respected. This is supported by what we know about therapy more broadly. Research has found that agreeing about the direction of therapy and collaborating on its goals are associated with better outcomes. In couples therapy, that collaboration is especially important, because there are two clients and a relationship in the room. If the therapist appears to adopt one partner's goal while treating the other person as the obstacle, therapy can quickly begin to feel unbalanced. If the entire focus becomes helping one person obtain more sex, the other partner may feel pressured or blamed. If the entire focus becomes improving communication, while the loss of affection and sexual intimacy is repeatedly postponed, the partner raising that concern may feel dismissed. A shared direction has to make room for both experiences. That doesn't mean both issues must receive exactly the same amount of attention in every session, though. It means neither concern is classified as the legitimate problem, while the other is treated as less worthy of attention.
The next question is whether you actually want a different outcome from your partner, or are you simply disagreeing about where to begin? This is an important distinction, because some goals genuinely point in different directions, but many couples want a similar destination and disagree about the sequence required to reach it. One partner may believe, if we start being physically affectionate again, we will feel closer and communication will become easier. The other may believe if we learn to communicate without hurting each other, physical closeness may become possible again. They may both want a more fulfilling and connective relationship. They simply have different beliefs about what has to change first. A helpful question you can ask each other, if this is you, is if both of these concerns improved, would you both want the relationship it would create? In other words, would you both want a relationship with less destructive conflict and more satisfying, mutually desired intimacy? If the answer is yes, you may not have different destinations.
The next question to ask is what would need to happen first or at the same time, so that both of you could participate in therapy without feeling ignored, pressured, or unsafe? Maybe you need to begin by learning how to discuss intimacy without the conversation becoming an accusation, demand, or someone shutting down. Maybe you need to temporarily take intercourse off the table, while rebuilding forms of affectionate touch, that feel comfortable and freely chosen by both of you. Or maybe both of you work on repairing the emotional injuries that have made physical closeness more difficult, while also making space to talk honestly about the grief, or rejection, or loneliness, connected to the lack of touch. Perhaps you begin by changing one predictable conflict pattern that repeatedly damages both emotional and sexual connection. The starting point should be specific enough to practice, relevant to both partners and respectful of consent and boundaries. It should also be understood as a starting point, not a permanent ruling about whose needs matter more.
Another valuable part of this process is identifying the cycle connecting you and your partner's goals. Couples often arrive in therapy describing each other as the problem. One person says, they never want sex. And the other one says, they pressure me and never listen. But a good therapist will also look at what happens between the two of you. For example, one person initiates physical intimacy and the other declines. So the first person experiences the rejection as evidence that they are no longer desired. And then they might respond with frustration, or criticism, or withdraw emotionally. And then the other person experiences that response as pressure or punishment, which makes physical intimacy feel even less emotionally safe. Then the two of you become more guarded and avoidant. That distance increases the first person's loneliness and urgency. And so then they initiate more intensely, or bring up the problem more frequently. So both of you end up reinforcing the exact conditions that you're trying to change.
This doesn't mean you're equally responsible for each other's behavior and it should never be used to minimize coercion, cruelty, betrayal, or other harmful conduct. It means that in many relationships, there's a pattern that neither partner intended, but both are now living inside. And once you can see the pattern, the shared goal becomes clearer. Instead of the goal being to get your partner to want more sex, it may become to help you both talk about intimacy, in a way that reduces pressure, or defensiveness, so that you both can better understand what is happening between you. Or instead of focusing on communication as the real problem, or on how improving communication will lead to better sex, the focus may become to help you and your partner interrupt the cycle in which conflict creates distance and your attempts to reconnect create even more conflict. That's a goal, both you and your partner can participate in without promising a predetermined sexual outcome.
Couples' therapy should not turn communication into a bargaining chip for sex. The higher desire partner should not be told, if you communicate correctly, your partner will eventually have sex with you. No therapist can ethically promise that outcome and no partner owes sexual access in exchange for relationship work. And at the same time, the lower desire partner's boundaries don't require the couple to avoid the subject entirely. The higher desire partner's sadness, loneliness, frustration, or uncertainty, still deserve room in therapy. Respecting a boundary is different from pretending the loss of physical intimacy has no emotional impact. Both partners need the opportunity to speak honestly. One person's consent and autonomy must be protected and the other person's experience of loss must be taken seriously. Shared direction doesn't mean guaranteeing that both people will get exactly the outcome they originally wanted. It means creating a process, in which neither person's experience has to disappear.
The way partners negotiate these different goals can also reveal something important about their relationship. Do they become defensive as soon as one person expresses a different priority? Does one partner automatically surrender their goal to avoid tension? Does one person insist that nothing can improve until the other changes first? Can they tolerate moving at a pace that is not entirely their own? If a couple can't discuss what they want from therapy, without repeating the same criticism, pressure, or withdrawal, they experience at home, that interaction gives the therapist useful information. Goal setting itself becomes part of the work. Once a shared starting point has been chosen, the treatment plan should remain open to revision. Couples sometimes assume that whatever they focus on first, will become the only issue therapy addresses. But a collaborative plan can change as new information emerges. A therapist might periodically ask questions like, does our current focus still reflect what matters to both of you? What has improved and what continues to feel stuck? Has your understanding of the problem changed? And are you both still willing to work toward this direction? These check-ins help prevent therapy from drifting toward one partner's agenda. And they also allow the couple to recognize progress that might otherwise be missed.
Perhaps the frequency hasn't changed, but the couple can now talk about it, without escalating into a fight, or shutting down and never revisiting it. That might not be the final outcome they want, but it's meaningful progress. Perhaps they're fighting less, but one partner still feels physically lonely and doesn't want that concern forgotten. And that is important information too. Successful therapy doesn't require couples to celebrate partial progress, as if every problem has been solved. It allows them to acknowledge what is changing, while remaining honest about what still needs attention. There are also situations in which partners don't simply have different treatment goals, but rather have different relationship agendas. An example of this is when one partner wants to repair the relationship, while the other is unsure whether they want to remain in it. Or one partner may be entering therapy to rebuild trust, while the other is entering therapy to decide whether repair is possible. And this also includes things like one partner wanting a monogamous relationship, while the other now has a desire to explore an open, non-monogamous relationship.
In those situations, immediately choosing to improve the relationship as the shared goal, can pressure the uncertain partner to make a commitment they haven't fully signed up for. The more appropriate initial goal may be clarity. Can both partners agree to understand what happened, what each person wants now, what would be required for repair and whether there's enough willingness to attempt it? Clarity is not a lesser goal. Sometimes it creates a path toward reconciliation. Sometimes it helps people make a painful decision with greater honesty and less confusion. The important thing is not to disguise a fundamental disagreement as a communication problem. So if you and your partner have been avoiding sex or couples therapy, because you want different things from it, start with these questions.
First, what does each person's goal mean to them? Instead of debating whose goal is more important, try to be curious about the emotional experience underneath your partner's stated goal. Second, do you want different destinations or do you disagree about where to begin? In other words, if both concerns improved, would you both want the relationship that resulted? Third, what pattern may be connecting your concerns? Think about how conflict affects affection and how physical distance affects communication. Also, what do each of you do in response to feeling rejected, pressured, criticized, or alone? And what tends to happen next? And finally, what is one shared starting point that respects both of you? Keep it small, specific and revisable. You don't need perfect agreement about what is wrong, before booking your first appointment. You just need enough honesty to say, this is what hurts for me. You also need enough curiosity to learn what the problem feels like for your partner and enough collaboration to identify a place where the two of you can begin. Different goals don't automatically make therapy impossible. The purpose of therapy is not to force those differences into an artificial agreement. It's to help you understand them, negotiate them more honestly and determine whether you can create a direction that respects both you and your partner.
So if this episode resonated with you and you would like help navigating different goals in your relationship, head over to risetointimacy.com to learn more about my offerings. And you can book a complimentary consultation there with me today. You can also sign up for my free weekly newsletter, The Quickie, for tips and tricks to help you strengthen your emotional and sexual relationship. Thanks so much for listening. I truly appreciate your support. And if you're enjoying the show, I would love it if you left a review wherever you listen. See you next Tuesday.
Thanks for listening to The RISE To Intimacy Podcast. If today's episode resonated with you, know that healing is possible and you don't have to do it alone. If you're enjoying the show, please leave a rating and review for us at ratethispodcast.com/rise. It really helps others find us and I'm so grateful for all your support. You can learn more about my coaching packages for individuals and couples at risetointimacy.com. And remember, sex therapy isn't for people who are broken. It's for people brave enough to look beneath the surface.
Comments